EMBAR

Author:
Zainab A.H. Al-Tamemi
College of Dentistry, University of Wasit, Wasit, Iraq

DOI: doi.org/10.58924/rjmp.v4.iss4.p2

Published Date: 21-Aug, 2025

Keywords: Cone Beam Computed Tomography, periapical lesions, early detection, sensitivity, specificity

Abstract:
Abstract Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic potentials of 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in comparison with conventional two-dimensional radiographic methods in early detection of periapical lesions. Materials and Methods: Participants included 63 subjects with suspected periapical pathology. A sample of 25 patients received CBCT evaluation (Group A) and 38 patients were evaluated using conventional radiographic techniques (Group B). Detection rates, sensitivity, and specificity were determined for each method. SigmaPlot (v11.0) was used to perform all statistical analyses. For categorical data, chi-squared analysis was used, and for continuous data, unpaired t-test analysis was used. Results: The use of CBCT (Group A) showed a significantly higher detection rate of periapical lesions (89%) than that of Group B (68%), (P<.001). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CBCT were 92% and 88%, respectively while those of traditional radiography were 75% and 78%, and there was statistical significance between the two diagnostic methods for sensitivity and specificity (P<.05). Conclusion: As a result, it can be concluded from the study that 3D cone beam computed tomography plays a pivotal role in the early detection of periapical lesions compared to the traditional methods. The augmented sensitivity and specificity of CBCT enhances the possibility for the CBCT to become a potential conventional diagnostic aid in endodontics.

References:

1. Alsaikhan, L., et al., A comparative analysis of periapical status by using cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences, 2022. 26(23).

2. Algahtani, F.N., et al., Prevalence of bone loss surrounding dental implants as detected in cone beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional study. PeerJ, 2023. 11.

3. Antony, D.P., T. Thomas, and M. Nivedhitha, Two-dimensional periapical, panoramic radiography versus three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of periapical lesion after endodontic treatment: A systematic review. Cureus, 2020. 12(4).

4. Bonfanti, E., et al., Digital orthopantomography vs cone beam computed tomography-part 2: a CBCT analysis of factors influencing the prevalence of periapical lesions. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2019. 20(6): p. 664-669.

5. Cotti, E. and E. Schirru, Present status and future directions: Imaging techniques for the detection of periapical lesions. International Endodontic Journal, 2022. 55: p. 1085-1099.

6. De Rosa, C.S., et al., Differentiation of periapical granuloma from radicular cyst using cone beam computed tomography images texture analysis. Heliyon, 2020. 6(10).

7. Feuerriegel, G.C., et al., Evaluation of 3D MRI for early detection of bone edema associated with apical periodontitis. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023. 27(9): p. 5403-5412.

8. Gudac, J., K. Hellén-Halme, and V. Maciulskiene, The Changes in Size of Periapical Lesions after Root Canal Treatments Assessed by Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A 2-Years Prospective Clinical Study. Medicina, 2022. 58(10): p. 1437.

9. Gurusamy, K., et al., Patient‐centric outcome assessment of endodontic microsurgery using periapical radiography versus cone beam computed tomography: A randomized clinical trial. International Endodontic Journal, 2023. 56(1): p. 3-16.

10. Hegde, V., et al., Prevalence of dens invaginatus and its association with periapical lesions in a Western Indian population—a study using cone-beam computed tomography. Clinical oral investigations, 2022. 26(9): p. 5875-5883.

11. Jadu, F.M. and A.M. Jan, A Comparative Study of Periapical Radiographs and Cone-beam Computed Tomography to Detect the Effects of Periapical Lesions. World Journal of Dentistry, 2020. 10(5): p. 346-349.

12. Kamburoğlu, K., et al., In vitro assessment of periapical lesions created in sheep mandibles by using high resolution ultrasonography and cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2021. 50(8): p. 20210048.

13. Kamburoğlu, K., et al., Effect of cone beam computed tomography voxel size and dental specialty status on the agreement of observers in the detection and measurement of periapical lesions. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 2021. 132(3): p. 346-351.

14. Karan, N.B. and B. Aricioğlu, Assessment of bone healing after mineral trioxide aggregate and platelet-rich fibrin application in periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020. 24: p. 1065-1072.

15. Kateb, N.M.E. and M.M. Fata, Influence of periapical lesion size on healing outcome following regenerative endodontic procedures: A clinical investigation. Oral Radiology, 2022: p. 1-10.

16. Kirnbauer, B., et al., Automatic detection of periapical osteolytic lesions on cone-beam computed tomography using deep convolutional neuronal networks. Journal of Endodontics, 2022. 48(11): p. 1434-1440.

16. Kopacz, M., et al., A clinical evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography: implications for endodontic microsurgery. Journal of endodontics, 2021. 47(6): p. 895-901.

18. Kurt Bayrakdar, S., et al., A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images. BMC Medical Imaging, 2021. 21(1): p. 86.

19. AL-Shaeli, S. J., Ethaeb, A. M., and Gharban, H. A. Determine the glucose regulatory role of decaffeinated Green Tea extract in reduces the metastasis and cell viability of MCF7 cell line. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022.2394(1), 020003.

20. Mackiewicz, E., T. Bonsmann, K. Kaczor-Wiankowska, and A. Nowicka, Volumetric Assessment of Apical Periodontitis Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography—A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023. 20(4): p. 2940.

21. Nageh, M., L.A. Ibrahim, F.M. AbuNaeem, and E. Salam, Management of internal inflammatory root resorption using injectable platelet-rich fibrin revascularization technique: a clinical study with cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022. 26(2): p. 1505-1516.

22. Nair, A.K., et al., Prevalence and pattern of proximity of maxillary posterior teeth to maxillary sinus with mucosal thickening: A cone beam computed tomography based retrospective study. Annals of African Medicine, 2023. 22(3): p. 327.

23. Pereira, B., et al., Association between endodontically treated maxillary and mandibular molars with fused roots and periapical lesions: A cone-beam computed tomography cross-sectional study. Journal of Endodontics, 2020. 46(6): p. 771-777. e1.

24 . PradeepKumar, A.R., et al., Diagnosis of vertical root fractures by cone-beam computed tomography in root-filled teeth with confirmation by direct visualization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of endodontics, 2021. 47(8): p. 1198-1214.

25. Ramis-Alario, A., et al., Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in measuring the periapical area of teeth scheduled for periapical surgery. A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2019. 11(8): p. e732.

26. Rouhani, A., et al., Prevalence of missed canals in endodontically treated teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2023. 15(8): p. e605.

27. Serindere, G., et al., Comparison of Ultrasonography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Differential Diagnosis of Periapical Lesions: A Prospective Radiopathological Study. Journal of Dentistry Indonesia. 29(3): p. 194-201.

28. Sharma, G., et al., Comparison of healing assessments of periapical endodontic surgery using conventional radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review. Imaging Science in Dentistry, 2022. 52(1): p. 1.

29. Terlemez, A., M. Tassoker, M. Kizilcakaya, and M. Gulec, Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the evaluation of maxillary sinus pathology related to maxillary posterior teeth: Do apical lesions increase the risk of maxillary sinus pathology? Imaging science in dentistry, 2019. 49(2): p. 115-122.

30. Yeung, A.W., R. Jacobs, and M.M. Bornstein, Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities. Clinical oral investigations, 2019. 23: p. 2573-2581.

31. Zadsirjan, S., M. Sheikhi, A. Dakhilalian, and M. Feli, Association of Inflammatory Periapical Lesions with Maxillary Sinus Abnormalities: a Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Journal of Dentistry, 2021. 22(4): p. 273.

32. Zhang, J., et al., Diagnosis of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis by Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Critical Review. Journal of Endodontics, 2023.

33. Zhang, M.-M., G.-F. Fang, Z.-H. Wang, and Y.-H. Liang, Clinical Outcome and Predictors of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Endodontics, 2023.